291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660762)
1. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part IV).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11660762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research.
Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Questions and answers.
Goodwin FK
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 11653321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The ethics of conducting psychosis-inducing experiments.
Sharav VH
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):137-67. PubMed ID: 11658172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Our responsibilities toward persons with mental illness as human subjects in research.
Shamoo AE
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11653306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. True protection for persons with severe mental disabilities, such as schizophrenia, involved as subjects in research? A look and consideration of the "Protection of Human Subjects.
Ryan AJ
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(2):349-76. PubMed ID: 11657417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ... (Part I).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Nov; 14(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 12194197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics of research design.
Moreno JD
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):175-82. PubMed ID: 11658174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychiatric researchers under fire.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1998 May; ():F1, F5. PubMed ID: 11648088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Parents say federal agency helps protect researchers from more than their subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 11913435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Parents say that controversial study was not ethically justifiable.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Dec; 15(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 11789518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.
DeRenzo EG
IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Placebo controls are not good science.
Weijer C; Appelbaum P
IRB; 1996; 18(5):8-10. PubMed ID: 11654741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical ethics in the dock.
N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Drug-free research in schizophrenia: an overview of the controversy.
Appelbaum PS
IRB; 1996; 18(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11660192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. State law on human research did not protect subjects' rights: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part I).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 11658037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychiatric unit's ethics faulted.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1998 May; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11648089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are existing safeguards adequate?
Caplan AL
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 11653316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research involving the vulnerable sick.
Weijer C
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 11657560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
