BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660763)

  • 1. Court says state agency avoided usual way of reporting problems with human subjects: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part II).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. State law on human research did not protect subjects' rights: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part I).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 11658037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New York State laws on protection of human subjects versus federal regulations: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part III).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Dec; 14(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health.
    New York. Supreme Court, New York County
    N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1995 Feb; 626():1015-24. PubMed ID: 12041120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State regulations on protecting mentally disabled research subjects are ruled invalid.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Oct; 14(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 11658062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond Nuremberg: fifty years later, the debate continues on informed consent.
    Barnes PG
    ABA J; 1997 Mar; 83():24-7. PubMed ID: 11660466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health.
    New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
    N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1996 Dec; 650():173-94. PubMed ID: 12041119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limited guardianship: additional protection for mentally disabled research subjects used in biomedical and behavioral research.
    Schaefer GF
    Forum; 1981; 16(4):796-824. PubMed ID: 11651838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychosurgery and the involuntarily confined.
    Kopesky JP
    Villanova Law Rev; 1979 Sep; 24(5-6):949-91. PubMed ID: 11665098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
    Dugan JC
    Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent for research is related to basic legal rights of all individuals.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Mar; 15(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 12199224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The HIV-AIDS epidemic and the child welfare system: protecting the rights of infants, young children, and adolescents.
    English A
    Iowa Law Rev; 1992 May; 77(4):1509-60. PubMed ID: 11653374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychosurgery and informed consent.
    Spoonhour JM
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1974; 26(3):432-52. PubMed ID: 11664397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informed consent in psychiatric research.
    Roth LH; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Benson P; Winslade WJ
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):425-41. PubMed ID: 11659013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
    Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
    Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Considering behavioral and biomedical research on detainees in the mental health unit of an urban mega-jail.
    Brakel SJ
    N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1996; 22(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11660427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surrogate consent and the incompetent experimental subject.
    Bein PM
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1991 Sep; 46(5):739-71. PubMed ID: 11651381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The certificate of confidentiality at the National Institute of Mental Health: discretionary considerations in its applicability in research on child and adolescent mental disorders.
    Hoagwood K
    Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 11654926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ethics of conducting research with older psychiatric patients.
    Fitten LJ
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1993 Jan; 8(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11659717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.