These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660763)
21. Beyond the "cuckoo's nest": a proposal for federal regulation of psychosurgery. Knowles S Harvard J Legis; 1975 Jun; 12(4):610-67. PubMed ID: 11664520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Judge tells Health Department to stop experiments on patients. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1995 Mar; ():52. PubMed ID: 11648000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. carey v. Population Services International: closing the curtain on Comstockery. Dubin AG Brooklyn Law Rev; 1978; 44(3):565-97. PubMed ID: 11664966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum. Wilson JP Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice. Berg P Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Legislative control of shock treatment. Moore E Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 9(4):738-77. PubMed ID: 11664532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part IV). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11660762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols. Gorenberg H; White A Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Court said IRB had too much power to make consent decisions for minors. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 12199227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Experimentation on humans and gifts of tissue: Articles 20-23 of the Civil Code. Owker WF McGill Law J; 1973; 19(2):161-94. PubMed ID: 11664267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Psychiatric guinea pigs are left in limbo. Boyce N New Sci; 1998 Nov; 160(2162):21. PubMed ID: 11660595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The regulation of electroconvulsive therapy in California: the impact of recent constitutional interpretations. Whitcomb D Gold Gate Law Rev; 1989; 18(2):469-94. PubMed ID: 11659134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Protecting the privacy of the absent patient: Rudnick v. Superior Court. Tarr RW Hastings Law J; 1975 Sep; 27(1):99-135. PubMed ID: 11664510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Regulatory pressures hamper the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy. Johnson SY Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():155-70. PubMed ID: 11659924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Uninformed decisionmaking. The case of surrogate research consent. Haimowitz S; Delano SJ; Oldham JM Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(6):9-16. PubMed ID: 9474489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Research on the decisionally impaired: overview and commentary. Ayd FJ Med Moral Newsl; 1998; 35(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11660518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe. Drinan RF America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Civil rights of the institutionalized. Bayh Be Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Feb; 126(30):S1707-47. PubMed ID: 11665218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]