275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660774)
1. To be, be, be ... not just to be: legal and social implications of cloning for human reproduction.
Chester R
Fla Law Rev; 1997 Apr; 49(2):303-37. PubMed ID: 11660774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Infertility Treatment Act 1995. No. 63 of 1995. Date of assent: 27 Jun 1995.
Australia. Victoria
Int Dig Health Legis; 1997; 48(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 11656775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New reproductive technologies and legal reform.
Roach SL
Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 11650410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The legal status of the embryo.
Andrews LB
Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications.
Wurmbrand MJ
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal aspects of human and genetic engineering.
Rozovsky LE
Manit Law J; 1975; 6(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 11662232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
;
Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial procreation, societal reconceptions: legal insight from France.
Jones DJ
Am J Comp Law; 1988; 36(3):525-45. PubMed ID: 11659138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whose child is it anyway?
Platt EF
Med Leg J; 1994; 62 ( Pt 4)():180-97. PubMed ID: 7845312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of in vitro fertilization: is there a right to bear or beget a child by any available medical means?
Eccles MR
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):1033-57. PubMed ID: 11655769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. From coitus to commerce: legal and social consequences of noncoital reproduction.
Hollinger JH
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):865-932. PubMed ID: 11655182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity.
O'Brien S
Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The regulation of assisted conception in England.
Stern K
Eur J Health Law; 1994; 1(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11654549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Liberty and assisted reproduction.
Robertson JA
Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Health panel seeks sweeping changes in fertility therapy.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1998 Apr; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 11648069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Life after death: New York state moves to keep dead men's sperm in the family.
Cohen P
New Sci; 1998 Mar; 157(2126):23. PubMed ID: 11660652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
