These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660774)
21. Man-made man and the law. Tuchler DJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1978; 22(2):310-25. PubMed ID: 11664955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Technology and motherhood: legal and ethical issues in human egg donation. Robertson JA Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1988-1989; 39(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11659264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Assisted reproductive technology and the family. Robertson JA Hastings Law J; 1996 Apr; 47(4):911-33. PubMed ID: 11656838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Where does a man stand on issues of assisted reproduction, surrogacy, artificial insemination within lesbian relationships and posthumous conception? Beem P Aust J Fam Law; 2004 Apr; 18(1):41-62. PubMed ID: 17058336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Artificial insemination and the law. Jensen BJ Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Matters of life and death: inheritance consequences of reproductive technologies. Shapo HS Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1091-220. PubMed ID: 11858286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference. Birck ML Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The clone age. Andrews LB; Rothstein MA; Latham SR; Garfinkel MD; Charo RA ABA J; 1997 Jul; 83():68-73. PubMed ID: 11655233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Regulating the new reproductive technologies: a cross-channel comparison. Latham M Med Law Int; 1998; 3(2-3):89-115. PubMed ID: 11657600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals. Wadlington WJ Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Law No. 35/1988 of 22 Nov 1988 on Assisted Reproduction Procedures (BoletÃn Oficial del Estado, 24 Nov 1988, No. 282, pp. 33373-33378). Spain Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 11659178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization. Flannery DM Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Perspectives on surrogate motherhood. Little MO Med Humanit Rev; 1995; 9(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 11653303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Surrogate parenthood: finding a North Carolina solution. Bartlett KT North Carol Centr Law J; 1989; 18(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11659326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction. Brenwald ML; Redeker K Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Cloning and the preservation of family integrity. Orentlicher D LA Law Rev; 1999; 59(4):1019-40. PubMed ID: 15156888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Reconciling property law with advances in reproductive science. Brown B Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):73-88. PubMed ID: 11655141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Who are the parents of biotechnological children? Palmer LI Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Law for protection of embryos. Germany Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]