These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660796)
1. Reproduction and rights: a response to Dorothy Roberts. Robertson JA Law Soc Inq; 1995; 20(4):1023-32. PubMed ID: 11660796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Restricting surrogacy to married couples: a constitutional problem? The married-parent requirement in the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act. Massie AM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):487-540. PubMed ID: 11651494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Touchdowns, toddlers, and taboos: on paying college athletes and surrogate contract mothers. Rush SE Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):549-614. PubMed ID: 11659320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New reproductive technologies in Canada and the United States: same problems, different discourses. Young AH Temple Int Comp Law J; 1998; 12(1):43-85. PubMed ID: 11660812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandating outpatient treatment for pregnant substance abusers: attractive but unfeasible. Blank RH Politics Life Sci; 1996 Mar; 15(1):49-50. PubMed ID: 11655014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The road not to travel: a comment on Deborah Mathieu's proposal to mandate outpatient treatment for pregnant substance abusers. Peretz P; Schroedel JR Politics Life Sci; 1996 Mar; 15(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 11655022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The search for coherence in reproductive policy. Merz JF J Leg Med; 1996 Mar; 17(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 11644847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to procreate: when rights claims have gone wrong. Shanner L McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):823-74. PubMed ID: 11654471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ethics of babymaking. Sherwin S Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 11644700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Feminist perspectives on reproductive technologies: the politics of motherhood. Chokr NN Technol Soc; 1992; 14(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 11652187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: medical technology + social values = legislative solutions. Milich MF J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(4):875-901. PubMed ID: 11652196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. From the individual to the dividual: in the supermarket of "reproductive alternatives. Mies M Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 11650396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich? Clapshaw D Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Statutory prohibitions and the regulation of new reproductive technologies under federal law in Canada. Healy P McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):905-46. PubMed ID: 11654474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A question of meaning? Controversies about the new reproductive technologies in the Netherlands. Kirejczyk M Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11649279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandatory treatment for pregnant substance abusers: irrelevant and dangerous. Chavkin W Politics Life Sci; 1996 Mar; 15(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 11655016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]