160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660806)
1. Penn researchers sued in gene therapy death: teen's parents also name ethicist as defendant.
Nelson D; Weiss R
Washington Post; 2000 Sep; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11660806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. F.D.A. officials fault Penn team in gene therapy death.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1999 Dec; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11648139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Money is putting people at risk in biomedical research.
Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar; 46(27):B1, B4-5. PubMed ID: 11657699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent process and document is criticized in court.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Court tells jury to ignore human subject protection regulations.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Mar; 10(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics lapses at Duke halt dozens of human experiments.
Hilts PJ; Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11648115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. If only it were so: medical physics, U.S. human radiation experiments, and the Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee (ACHRE).
Martensen R
Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(2):21-36. PubMed ID: 11645853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. moves to require disclosure of gene tests.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1999 Oct; ():A9. PubMed ID: 11648138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A little too much of the Buchenwald touch? Military radiation research at the University of Cincinnati, 1960-1972.
Egilman D; Wallace W; Stubbs C; Mora-Corrasco F
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):63-102. PubMed ID: 11660591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Calls for strengthened drug-trial guidelines in Japan.
Netley G
Lancet; 1997 Feb; 349(9051):552. PubMed ID: 11654595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S., researchers reach deal in '99 gene therapy case.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 2005 Feb; ():A3. PubMed ID: 15742518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A doctor's drug studies turn into fraud.
Eichenwald K; Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice.
Delgado R; Leskovac H
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ban on medical experiments without consent is relaxed.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1996 Nov; ():A1, C6. PubMed ID: 11647142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A U.S. experiment on young children ignites painful debate.
Moss M
Wall St J (East Ed); 1996 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11648019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously.
Goldner JA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Walking a thin line: distinguishing between research and medical practice during Operation Desert Storm.
Schuchardt EJ
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1992; 26(1):77-115. PubMed ID: 11651647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
