These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660812)

  • 1. New reproductive technologies in Canada and the United States: same problems, different discourses.
    Young AH
    Temple Int Comp Law J; 1998; 12(1):43-85. PubMed ID: 11660812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statutory prohibitions and the regulation of new reproductive technologies under federal law in Canada.
    Healy P
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):905-46. PubMed ID: 11654474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ethics of babymaking.
    Sherwin S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 11644700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The right to procreate: when rights claims have gone wrong.
    Shanner L
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):823-74. PubMed ID: 11654471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
    Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The search for coherence in reproductive policy.
    Merz JF
    J Leg Med; 1996 Mar; 17(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 11644847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward a new analysis of the abortion debate.
    Bell KL
    Ariz Law Rev; 1991; 33(4):907-35. PubMed ID: 11656167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To bear or not to bear: reproductive freedom as an international human right.
    Hernández BE
    Brooklyn J Int Law; 1991; 17(2):309-58. PubMed ID: 11656131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion and the right of privacy.
    Ortega ML
    Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New constitutional and penal theory in Spanish abortion law.
    Stith R
    Am J Comp Law; 1987; 35(3):513-58. PubMed ID: 11655866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surrogate motherhood contracts: should the British or Canadian model fill the U.S. legislative vacuum?
    Serratelli A
    George Washington J Int Law Econ; 1993; 26(3):633-74. PubMed ID: 11652952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The abortion debate: the search for common ground, part 2.
    Davis NA
    Ethics; 1993 Jul; 103(4):731-78. PubMed ID: 11656201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
    Manson R; Marolt J
    Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Weaving "birth" technology into the "value and policy web" of medicine, ethics and law: should policies on "conception" be consistent?
    Somerville MA
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):515-608. PubMed ID: 11650354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion.
    Koppelman A
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada.
    McConnell ML
    Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
    Capron AM
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
    Bennett B
    Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.