1820 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660819)
1. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
Jellinek MS; Levine RJ
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
van Eys J; Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
Bagley G
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protection of human subjects.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Code Fed Regul Public Welfare; 1995 Oct; Title 45(Sections 46-101 to 46-409):. PubMed ID: 11686173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New human subject regulations would change certain IRB reviews.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Jul; 13(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11656820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
Branson R
J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
Freedman B
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
Puglisi JT; Ellis GB
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
Herch F; Flower R
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospital failed on human research policy.
Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Why HHS should reconsider its proposed exemption for social policy experiments.
Abram MB;
IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. IRBs and research with human biological materials.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 11657556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposed regulations for research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: a consideration of their relevance in 1995.
Levine RJ
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):177-86. PubMed ID: 11654513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary.
Reiser SJ; Knudson P
IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Considering behavioral and biomedical research on detainees in the mental health unit of an urban mega-jail.
Brakel SJ
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1996; 22(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11660427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
