These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660860)
1. In vitro fertilization of human eggs: bioethical and legal considerations. Marx JL Science; 1973 Nov; 182(4114):812-3. PubMed ID: 11660860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: fertile areas for litigation. Lorio KV Southwest Law J; 1982 Feb; 35(5):973-1011. PubMed ID: 11658618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A survey of the legal, ethical, and public policy considerations of in vitro fertilization. McCartan MK Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):695-731. PubMed ID: 11650889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization. Flannery DM Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Test tube babies: the quandaries of creation. Futurist; 1979 Dec; 13(6):487-8. PubMed ID: 11662006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Congress should prohibit use of tax dollars for test tube baby research. Rudd E Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1979 Mar; 125(31):E1112-4. PubMed ID: 11662598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Manipulating the genetic code: jurisprudential conundrums. Smith GP Georgetown Law J; 1976 Feb; 64(3):697-733. PubMed ID: 11660899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The prospect of private unauthorized eugenics and ten feet tall basketball players: a case of legislative oversight? Meredith RD J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):155-72. PubMed ID: 11645591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. rules hurt fertilization research. Krieger L Am Med News; 1984 Oct; 27(37):14. PubMed ID: 11658529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of the third annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Burfoot A Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 11650377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Test-tube baby study debated by HEW panel. Cohn V Washington Post; 1979 Feb; ():A7. PubMed ID: 11649155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Test-tube baby study wins approval. Cohn V Washington Post; 1979 Feb; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11648745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal research: a view from right to life to wrongful birth. Munson JW Chic Kent Law Rev; 1975; 52(1):133-56. PubMed ID: 11664521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro veritas. Tucker W New Repub; 1981 Oct; 185(17):14-6. PubMed ID: 11650718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro fertilization: perspectives on current issues. Ephross JN Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):447-72. PubMed ID: 11656221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Govt. block of fetal research set back in-vitro work 5 years. Kubetin WR Ob Gyn News; 1984 Mar 15-31; 19(6):1, 38. PubMed ID: 11647773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights. Crockett KG; Hyman M Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The pangs of test-tube birth. Sartwell F Washington Post; 1974 Jul; ():C5. PubMed ID: 11648662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. End seen to moratorium on in-vitro fertilization funds. Schaeffer PM Ob Gyn News; 1979 Mar; 14(5):25. PubMed ID: 11662692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. No federal funds for in vitro fertilization. Roth T Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1979 Jun; 125(86):E3228. PubMed ID: 11661769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]