These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660867)

  • 1. Wrongful death and the unborn: an examination of recovery after Roe v. Wade.
    Kruger RE
    J Fam Law; 1973; 13(1):99-114. PubMed ID: 11660867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The law of tortious prenatal death since Roe v. Wade.
    Kader D
    Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(4):639-66. PubMed ID: 11658350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Damages for the wrongful death of a fetus--proof of fetal viability--Illinois recognizes an action for the wrongful death of a stillborn fetus.
    Elliott H
    Chic Kent Law Rev; 1974; 51(1):227-43. PubMed ID: 11662120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Torts--wrongful death--a viable fetus is a "person" under the New Mexico wrongful death statute: Salazar v. St. Vincent Hospital.
    Donahue SL
    N M Law Rev; 1982; 12(2):843-59. PubMed ID: 11658657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. California's response for wrongful death of a stillborn fetus: Justus v. Atchison.
    Dow PA
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1978; 3(2):589-608. PubMed ID: 11664965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Torts--wrongful death--recovery for wrongful death of a stillborn fetus examined.
    Cherken HS
    Villanova Law Rev; 1976 Oct; 21(5-6):994-1005. PubMed ID: 11664726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dunn v. Rose Way, Inc.: no recovery for wrongful death of a viable fetus under Section 611.20 of the Iowa Code.
    Hodgson SL
    Iowa Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 70(2):545-64. PubMed ID: 11649214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wrongful death--a viable fetus is a person within the meaning of the Massachusetts Wrongful Death Statute.
    Blakeley T
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1976; 7(3):821-7. PubMed ID: 11664789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Didonato v. Wortman.
    North Carolina. Supreme Court
    South East Report Second Ser; 1987 Jul; 358():489-97. PubMed ID: 12041309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal rights? It depends.
    Doudera AE
    Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):38-44, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11649512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Injuries to unborn children.
    Cane PF
    Aust Law J; 1977 Oct; 51(10):704-20. PubMed ID: 11665004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prenatal wrongful death.
    Steinbock B
    Bioethics; 1987 Oct; 1(4):301-20. PubMed ID: 11651905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The unborn child in Canadian law.
    Weiler KM; Catton K
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1976 Dec; 14(3):643-59. PubMed ID: 11664746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Right to maintain action or to recover damages for death of unborn child.
    Shapiro SR
    Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 84():411-72. PubMed ID: 12091934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Werling v. Sandy.
    Ohio. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1985 Apr; 476():1053-7. PubMed ID: 12041268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases.
    Klasing MS
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life.
    Parness JA; Pritchard SK
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective abortion and the diagnosis of fetal damage: issues and concerns.
    Cohen LG
    J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps; 1986; 11(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 11655848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
    Rice CE
    Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.