These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660919)

  • 1. 'Rights' are not enough: prospects for a new approach to the morality of abortion.
    Rossi PJ
    Linacre Q; 1979 May; 46(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 11660919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion: a misplaced debate.
    Brockway AR
    Engage Soc Action; 1974 Feb; 2(2):33-47. PubMed ID: 11663497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jewish views on abortion.
    Jakobovits I
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 11663541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Law, morals and abortion: alternatives in light of the Supreme Court's decision.
    Degnan DA
    Commonweal; 1974 May; 100(13):305-8. PubMed ID: 11663441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Notes for a 'new, fresh, compelling' statement.
    Whitmore TD
    America (NY); 1994 Oct; 171(10):14-8. PubMed ID: 11659874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion, moral maturity and civic journalism.
    Patterson MJ; Hall MW
    Crit Stud Mass Commun; 1998 Jun; 15(2):91-115. PubMed ID: 11657765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moral rights and abortion.
    McLachlan HV
    Contemp Rev; 1976 Jun; 228(1325):323-8. PubMed ID: 11663704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion or the unwanted child: a choice for a humanistic society.
    Prescott JW
    Humanist; 1975; 35(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 11663531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contestation and consensus: the morality of abortion in Japan.
    LaFleur WR
    Philos East West; 1990 Oct; 40(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 11660037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion, the public morals, and the police power: the ethical function of substantive due process.
    Perry MJ
    UCLA Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 23(4):689-736. PubMed ID: 11663667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Induced abortion, Jewish law and Jewish morality.
    Rosner F
    Man Med; 1976; 1(3):213-26. PubMed ID: 12085912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letter: Unwanted pregnancy and abortion.
    Kok CW
    Can Med Assoc J; 1975 Feb; 112(4):419-20. PubMed ID: 1111886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The father's rights in the abortion decision.
    Schultz WL
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1975; 6(3):1075-94. PubMed ID: 11664508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Moral principles of health justice].
    Barousse AP
    Medicina (B Aires); 1992; 52(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 1342694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion.
    Lidz RW
    Conn Med; 1978 Mar; 42(3):201-2. PubMed ID: 11663827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can technology solve the abortion dilemma?
    Maguire MR
    Christ Century; 1976 Oct; 93(34):918-9. PubMed ID: 11663690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
    Riggs T
    San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion: a challenge to halakhah.
    Greenberg B
    Judaism; 1976; 25(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 11663662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To abort or not to abort: whose decision is it?
    Thompson PA
    Crux; 1974; 12(4):22-4. PubMed ID: 11663740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Amendment No. 336.
    Bartlett DF
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.