These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660933)
1. Constitutional collision course: family autonomy and the rights of minors in voluntary commitment proceedings. Gallion T LA Law Rev; 1980; 40(4):985-97. PubMed ID: 11660933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment of children by parents--Parham v. J.R. Citarella KC NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(4):1001-25. PubMed ID: 11658638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L. Simet DP Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Due process and voluntary commitment by parents of juveniles to mental health facilities. Hodgeman RB Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1980; 49(1):259-69. PubMed ID: 11658342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Due process rights of minors and parental authority in civil commitment cases. Gartin E Mercer Law Rev; 1980; 31(2):617-25. PubMed ID: 11661876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--due process--minor child may be "voluntarily" committed to mental institution by parents or guardian following precommitment approval. Koller HM Villanova Law Rev; 1980 Mar; 25(3):537-50. PubMed ID: 11665273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional law--due process--juveniles committed to state mental hospitals upon application of parents or guardians are not entitled to adversarial hearings. Secrest LF Emory Law J; 1980; 29(2):517-62. PubMed ID: 11665263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions? Zenoff EH; Zients AB George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R. Spaulding WJ Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutional law--due process does not require an adversary hearing prior to commitment of children to mental hospitals by their parent or guardian. Humphrey P Santa Clara Law Rev; 1980; 20(1):269-75. PubMed ID: 11665162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Parental power in the voluntary commitment of children to mental institutions. Riggert BA Washburn Law J; 1978; 17(3):595-614. PubMed ID: 11662571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Due process for minors "voluntarily" committed to mental institutions: does father know best? Recommendations for Illinois. Gifford M South Ill Univ Law J; 1980; 1980(2):171-97. PubMed ID: 12083084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Children's rights: a movement in search of meaning. Bricker SW Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):661-93. PubMed ID: 11665158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Involuntary civil commitment: the inadequacy of existing procedural and substantive protections. Matteson K UCLA Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 28(4):906-51. PubMed ID: 11658605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Institutionalization of juveniles: what process is due? Parham v. J.R. Herbsleb J Neb Law Rev; 1980; 59(1):190-213. PubMed ID: 11658460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Children and the idea of liberty: a comment on the civil commitment cases. Garvey JH KY Law J; 1979-1980; 68(54):809-43. PubMed ID: 11649181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles: civil commitments and the balance of authority between child, parent, and state. Martin CA Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1980 Jan; 7(1):158-69. PubMed ID: 11660936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]