These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Why the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act has failed. Weissman SI Trusts Estates; 1977 Apr; 116(4):264-267+. PubMed ID: 11661473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The case for a post-mortem organ draft and a proposed model organ draft act. Silver T Boston Univ Law Rev; 1989 Jul; 68(4):681-728. PubMed ID: 11650249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An alternative policy for obtaining cadaver organs for transplantation. Muyskens JL Philos Public Aff; 1978; 8(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 11661624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Consent and organ donation. Cooper SM Rutgers Comput Technol Law J; 1985; 11(2):559-88. PubMed ID: 12091919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. You can't always get what you want. Goldblatt AD Update; 1997 Jul; 13(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 11655273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternatives to current organ donation statutes. Musial EM Dial Transplant; 1982 Aug; 11(8):658. PubMed ID: 11653695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Liability issues arising out of hospitals' and organ procurement organizations' rejection of valid anatomical gifts: the truth and consequences. Jardine DG Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(6):1655-94. PubMed ID: 11659458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Whose tissues are they anyway? A proposal for state ownership of the human body and its parts. Schoenfeld MR J Cardiovasc Diagn Proced; 1994-1995; 12(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 11654296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Market and non-market mechanisms for procuring human and cadaveric organs: when the price is right. Smith GP Med Law Int; 1993; 1(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 11659738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The body as property: some philosophical reflections -- a response to J.F. Childress. Andrews LB Transplant Proc; 1992 Oct; 24(5):2149-51. PubMed ID: 11643030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The sale of human organs: implicating a privacy right. Johnson KL Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1987; 21(3):741-62. PubMed ID: 11649985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The gift of life: ethical problems and policies in obtaining and distributing organs for transplantation. Childress JF Prim Care; 1986 Jun; 13(2):379-94. PubMed ID: 11644058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Choosing life after death: respecting religious beliefs and moral convictions in near death decisions. Goldberg CK Syracuse Law Rev; 1988; 39(4):1197-260. PubMed ID: 11653917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The "new body snatchers": analyzing the effect of presumed consent organ donation laws on privacy, autonomy, and liberty. Liddy M Fordham Urban Law J; 2001 Feb; 28(3):815-53. PubMed ID: 16493802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "She's got Bette Davis eyes": assessing the nonconsensual removal of cadaver organs under the takings and due process clauses. Jaffe ES Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 90(2):528-74. PubMed ID: 11659304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of the family in cadaveric organ procurement. Naylor CD Indiana Law J; 1989; 65(1):167-89. PubMed ID: 11650904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomical gifts: considerations and critiques. Gadzala DE Med Trial Tech Q; 1992; 38():464-79. PubMed ID: 11653088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]