These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11660987)
1. The woman's right of privacy. Weddington S Perkins J; 1973; 27(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 11660987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway? Gallagher J Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion. Moore EN Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-identification and the morality of abortion. Lusby K Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to live. Koop CE Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):65-87. PubMed ID: 11663567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Death before life: abortion as a moral symbol. Frankel LH; Flynn JJ J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):267-85. PubMed ID: 11662359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade. Lockhart T Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Social commentary: values and legal personhood. Parness JA West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. roe v. Wade: the rhetoric of fetal life. Hagan MR Cent States Speech J; 1976; 27(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 11663703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy. Haley JN Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron. Coleman JJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to abortion: expansion of the right to privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment. Goldenberg D Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):36-57. PubMed ID: 11663414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and democracy for women: a critique of Tremblay v. Daigle. Greschner D McGill Law J; 1990 Sep; 35(3):633-69. PubMed ID: 11656074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process. Gelinas A Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion, personhood, and privacy in Texas. Johnson A Tex Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 68(7):1521-44. PubMed ID: 11656019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution. Dawson TB Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications. Riggs T San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]