These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661022)
1. A proposed statute for implementing the abortion decisions. Sykes JM J Fam Law; 1973; 13(2):332-65. PubMed ID: 11661022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975. U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis. Linton PB Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Texas abortion law: consent requirements and special statutes. Tottenham TO; Peterson DM; Reingen ML Houst Law Rev; 1981 May; 18(4):819-48. PubMed ID: 11649418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Therapeutic abortion and the minor. Gibbs RF J Leg Med (N Y); 1973; 1(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 11662355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention. MacDougal D; Nasser WP Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion after Roe and Doe: a proposed statute. Anderson MB Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1973 May; 26(4):823-36. PubMed ID: 11663402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy. Long SL; Ravenscraft P Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment. Hatch OG Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy. Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Canadian abortion quagmire: the way in and a way out. Hunter IA Can Fam Law Q; 1990; 6():57-78. PubMed ID: 11656050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role. Witherspoon JP Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An analysis of the 1974 Massachusetts Abortion Statute and a minor's right to abortion. Malfa KA New Engl Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):417-54. PubMed ID: 11664438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Due process and equal protection: constitutional implications of abortion notice and reporting requirements. Rickless DM Boston Univ Law Rev; 1976 May; 56(3):522-41. PubMed ID: 11664624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Spousal notification and consent in abortion situations: Scheinberg v. Smith. Wiemers D Houst Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 19(5):1025-39. PubMed ID: 11658560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]