These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Informed consent: a changing standard of disclosure. Eslami M Conn Med; 1984 Jun; 48(6):407. PubMed ID: 11644146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony. Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part One. Robertson G Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1985 Jan; 18(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11658769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness. Kopis WF St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976. Curtis JV KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act. Rosen MW Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed decision making: CMA policy summary. Canadian Medical Association CMAJ; 1986 Nov; 135(10):1208A-B. PubMed ID: 11658851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments. Murphy WJ Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Modern status of views as to general measure of physician's duty to inform patient of risks of proposed treatment. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 88():1008-44. PubMed ID: 12091933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent and the danger of bias in the formation of medical disclosure practices. Schneyer TJ Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(1):124-70. PubMed ID: 11664629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A doctor's duty to disclose life expectancy information to terminally ill patients. Dickerson DA Clevel State Law Rev; 1995; 43(2):319-50. PubMed ID: 11660488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychiatric research--the psychotic patient and informed consent. Hall RC Am J Forensic Psychiatry; 1978 May; 1(1):42-63. PubMed ID: 11661984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient. Rauzi E Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects. Alsobrook HB Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent. Peters OF Med Group Manage; 1973; 20(5):17-18+. PubMed ID: 11664281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]