BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661045)

  • 1. Ethically questionable data: publish or reject?
    DeBakey L
    Clin Res; 1974 Apr; 22(3):113-21. PubMed ID: 11661045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimentation in gastroenterology.
    Vilardell Fe
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1977 Supplement 47: 49-59; 12():. PubMed ID: 11665064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
    Herch F; Flower R
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidentiality and research.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(9):1299. PubMed ID: 11654014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical considerations in the publication of the results of research involving human subjects.
    Levine RJ
    Clin Res; 1973 Oct; 21(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 11660968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical considerations in human experimentation.
    Bernstein JE
    J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1975; 15(8-9):579-90. PubMed ID: 11661224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The editor and the IRB: should journals notify IRBs about possibly unethical research with human subjects?
    Szidon JP; Swazey JP
    IRB; 1986; 8(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11653766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics in medical research.
    P N G Med J; 1973 Sep; 16(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 11661003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Journal of Pediatrics policy with respect to research employing human subjects.
    J Pediatr Surg; 1973 Nov; 83(5):709-10. PubMed ID: 11664246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thin line between research and audit.
    Choo V
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9125):337-8. PubMed ID: 9717915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publication: an ethical imperative.
    Pearn J
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6990):1313-5. PubMed ID: 7773049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When does an experimental/innovative procedure become an accepted procedure?
    Norton ML
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1975 Oct; 38(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 11661188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychosurgery in Massachusetts: a task force report.
    Stone AA
    Mass Journal Ment Health; 1975; 5(3):26-54. PubMed ID: 11664587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attempts at suppressing data.
    Shamoo AE; Quist N; Howe EG
    Prof Ethics Rep; 1997; 10(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 11660483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomedical technology--the ethical dilemmas.
    JSAC Grapevine; 1974 Dec; 6(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11661093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protecting human subjects: how much responsibility falls to editorial boards?
    Wegman DH; Major E
    Am J Ind Med; 2009 Feb; 52(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 19016264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.
    Atici E; Erdemir AD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 18375684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
    Himmelsbach CK
    Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-220. PubMed ID: 12085911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Helsinki Declaration: proposed revision.
    Schüklenk U
    Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Jul; No. 149():2. PubMed ID: 11657800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
    Cowan DH
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.