354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661088)
1. kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health: a right to be free from experimental psychosurgery?
Mason JR
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):301-39. PubMed ID: 11661088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent to organic behavior control.
Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Advances in mental health: a case for the right to refuse treatment.
Levick M; Wapner A
Temple Law Q; 1975; 48(2):354-83. PubMed ID: 11664437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutional law--an involuntarily detained mental patient's informed consent is invalid for experimental psychosurgery.
Fabri CJ
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1974; 50(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 11664306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Total institutions and the possibility of consent to organic therapies.
Murphy JG
Human Rights; 1975; 5(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 11664551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law.
Wade MD
Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health: involuntary mental patient cannot give informed consent to experimental psychosurgery.
Gold JA
Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(2):207-27. PubMed ID: 11664643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In the name of treatment: autonomy, civil commitment, and right to refuse treatment.
Schwartz BM
Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Jun; 50(5):808-42. PubMed ID: 11664466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legislating the control of behavior control: autonomy and the coercive use of organic therapies.
Shapiro MH
South Calif Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 47(2):237-356. PubMed ID: 11660869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychosurgery: the rights of patients.
Plamondon AL
Loyola Law Rev; 1977; 23(4):1007-28. PubMed ID: 11664912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Therapeutic justifications for intervention into mentation and behavior.
Shapiro MH
Duquesne Law Rev; 1975; 13(4):673-781. PubMed ID: 11661265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond the "cuckoo's nest": a proposal for federal regulation of psychosurgery.
Knowles S
Harvard J Legis; 1975 Jun; 12(4):610-67. PubMed ID: 11664520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Kaimowitz case: a short term legal restraint contrary to the long term public good.
Koskoff YD
Duquesne Law Rev; 1975; 13(4):879-906. PubMed ID: 11661270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical treatment and human experimentation: introducing illegality, fraud, duress and incapacity to the doctrine of informed consent.
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1975; 6(3):538-64. PubMed ID: 11664504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Return to the cuckoo's nest: an examination of the National Commission report on psychosurgery.
Spronz SC
Hofstra Law Rev; 1978; 6(4):941-71. PubMed ID: 11664974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
Miller RD
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The law and the biological revolution.
Gaylin We
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1973; 10(1):47-76. PubMed ID: 11664303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to refuse treatment in New Jersey.
Perlin ML
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11662299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
