These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661113)
1. The legal implications of ectogenetic research. Abel K Tulsa Law J; 1974; 10(2):243-55. PubMed ID: 11661113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Law for protection of embryos. Germany Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies. Andrews LB ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: a critique of the final report. Shanner L Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1994 Mar; 27(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11659921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal research: a view from right to life to wrongful birth. Munson JW Chic Kent Law Rev; 1975; 52(1):133-56. PubMed ID: 11664521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Techniques of Assisted Reproduction: Act 35/1988. Spain Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Nov; No. 282():. PubMed ID: 12041504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism. Westerfield L South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization. Flannery DM Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Norwegian law on assisted reproduction and genetics: the act relating to the application of biotechnology in medicine. Norway Bull Med Ethics; 1994; No. 99():8-11. PubMed ID: 11659892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights. Crockett KG; Hyman M Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion in Japan: a feminist critique. Maruyama H Wis Womens Law J; 1995; 10():131-60. PubMed ID: 11660313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal research IV: the living fetus and the law--the state's role. Kindregan CP Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):133-44. PubMed ID: 11663566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical experiments and the new law: in vitro fertilisation procedures, embryo experimentation and the law. Bravender-Coyle P Law Inst J; 1985; 59(1-2):63-7. PubMed ID: 12083090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal implications of biomedical science and technology in the twenty-first century. Castel JG Can Bar Rev; 1973 Mar; 51(1):119-36. PubMed ID: 11660992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of fetal eggs and infertility treatment: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, section 3A. Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(2):203-4. PubMed ID: 11656732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Who are the parents of biotechnological children? Palmer LI Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards a practical implementation of the abortion decision: the interests of the physician, the woman and the fetus. Sebek M De Paul Law Rev; 1976; 25(3):676-706. PubMed ID: 11664630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bio-medical technology: of the kingdom or of the cosmos? Breck J St Vladmirs Theol Q; 1988; 32(1):5-26. PubMed ID: 11659731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus. Wood MA; Hawkins LB Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]