BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661163)

  • 1. Experimenting on human subjects: philosophical perspectives.
    Macklin R; Sherwin S
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):434-71. PubMed ID: 11661163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moral issues in medical experimentation on humans.
    Cohen C
    Philos Exch; 1979; 2(5):37-51. PubMed ID: 11658450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The research imperative and human rights.
    Stone RS
    Phila Med; 1974 Feb; 70(2):73+. PubMed ID: 11664583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legal aspects of experimentation with institutionalized mentally disabled subjects.
    Laves BS
    J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1976 Part 2): 592-599, Oct; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 11664683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informed consent and the nonautonomous person: the dynamics of dependency relationships.
    Dyer AR
    IRB; 1982; 4(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal and ethical concepts involved in informed consent to human research.
    Woody KJ
    Calif West Law Rev; 1981; 18(1):50-79. PubMed ID: 11658328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Justifying a principle of informed consent: a case study in autonomy-based ethics.
    Gunderson M
    Public Aff Q; 1990 Jul; 4(3):249-65. PubMed ID: 11659297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patients, agents, and informed consent.
    Haber JG
    J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1():43-59.. PubMed ID: 11658933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research with human subjects.
    Ackerman TF
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(5):47-9. PubMed ID: 11653831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What should subjects be told about withdrawing from a protocol?
    Levine RJ
    IRB; 1981 Nov; 3(9):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some problems in gaining informed consent from psychiatric patients.
    Macklin R
    Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 11653484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research.
    Ackerman TF
    IRB; 1992; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ethics of conducting research with older psychiatric patients.
    Fitten LJ
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1993 Jan; 8(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11659717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Respect for persons and informed consent to participate in research.
    Lebacqz K; Levine RJ
    Clin Res; 1977 Apr; 25(3):101-7. PubMed ID: 11664815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ethical framework for the practice of paying research subjects.
    Ackerman TF
    IRB; 1989; 11(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11650243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A communal model for presumed consent for research on the neurologically vulnerable.
    Thomasma DC
    Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):227-39. PubMed ID: 11654518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimenting on human subjects.
    May WE
    Linacre Q; 1974 Nov; 41(4):238-52. PubMed ID: 11662103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the moral philosophy of the Belmont Report rest on a mistake?
    Marshall E
    IRB; 1986; 8(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 11649820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research participation as a contract.
    Lawson C
    Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 11660017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.