These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661259)
1. Rules created to control DNA research. Sci News; 1975 Dec; 108(24):372-3. PubMed ID: 11661259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic manipulation: recommendations drafted. Norman C Nature; 1975 Dec; 258(5536):561-4. PubMed ID: 11643295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Battle lines drawn over DNA research. Joyce C New Sci; 1983 Sep; 99(1377):912. PubMed ID: 11655568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On the dangers of genetic meddling. Chargaff E; Simring FR Science; 1976 Jun; 192(4243):938+. PubMed ID: 11643312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Should science be stopped? The case of recombinant DNA research. Gershon ES Public Interest; 1983; No. 71():3-16. PubMed ID: 11650689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NIH committee drafts rules for genetic experiments. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1975 Dec; 5(22):5-7. PubMed ID: 11661262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does genetic engineering need genetic engineers?: should the regulation of genetic engineering include a new professional discipline? Auchincloss S Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1993; 20(1):37-63. PubMed ID: 11652234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1984 Nov; 49(227):46266-91. PubMed ID: 11655642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recombinant DNA and technology assessment. Georgetown Law J; 1977; 11(4):785-878. PubMed ID: 11664859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene-splicers battle over potato field. Heneson N New Sci; 1983 Sep; 99(1376):831. PubMed ID: 11655566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health. Wichman A; Mills D; Sandler AL IRB; 1996; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biotech firms win approval for more open-air tests. Joyce C New Sci; 1984 Jun; 102(1413):4. PubMed ID: 11655646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after. Barkstrom JE Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The challenge of biotechnology. Gore A; Owens S Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):336-57. PubMed ID: 11652468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular biology or molecular politics? The production of scientific consensus on the hazards of recombinant DNA technology. Wright S Soc Stud Sci; 1986 Nov; 16(4):593-620. PubMed ID: 11650809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules. Wilson DJ Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Recombinant DNA: triumph or Trojan horse? Holtzman E Man Med; 1977; 2(2):83-103, W7. PubMed ID: 12083131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular politics in a global economy. Wright S Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):249-63. PubMed ID: 11654797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research. Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]