These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661265)
1. Therapeutic justifications for intervention into mentation and behavior. Shapiro MH Duquesne Law Rev; 1975; 13(4):673-781. PubMed ID: 11661265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Advances in mental health: a case for the right to refuse treatment. Levick M; Wapner A Temple Law Q; 1975; 48(2):354-83. PubMed ID: 11664437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health: a right to be free from experimental psychosurgery? Mason JR Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):301-39. PubMed ID: 11661088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent to organic behavior control. Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The new Ohio Mental Health Act. Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--an involuntarily detained mental patient's informed consent is invalid for experimental psychosurgery. Fabri CJ Chic Kent Law Rev; 1974; 50(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 11664306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law. Wade MD Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right of the civilly committed mental patient to refuse treatment. Wellsch T Sask Law Rev; 1983-1984; 48(2):269-91. PubMed ID: 11658817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Status of the emergency room psychotherapist: privacy rites. Heimberg SA UCLA Law Rev; 1983 Aug; 30(6):1316-48. PubMed ID: 11649584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In the name of treatment: autonomy, civil commitment, and right to refuse treatment. Schwartz BM Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Jun; 50(5):808-42. PubMed ID: 11664466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health: involuntary mental patient cannot give informed consent to experimental psychosurgery. Gold JA Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(2):207-27. PubMed ID: 11664643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Total institutions and the possibility of consent to organic therapies. Murphy JG Human Rights; 1975; 5(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 11664551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legislating the control of behavior control: autonomy and the coercive use of organic therapies. Shapiro MH South Calif Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 47(2):237-356. PubMed ID: 11660869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill. Fields JD Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychosurgery: the rights of patients. Plamondon AL Loyola Law Rev; 1977; 23(4):1007-28. PubMed ID: 11664912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychosurgery and the involuntarily confined. Kopesky JP Villanova Law Rev; 1979 Sep; 24(5-6):949-91. PubMed ID: 11665098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal regulation of applied behavior analysis in mental institutions and prisons. Friedman PR Ariz Law Rev; 1975; 17(1):39-104. PubMed ID: 11661217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]