1291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661280)
1. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical considerations in human experimentation.
Bernstein JE
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1975; 15(8-9):579-90. PubMed ID: 11661224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Against special protections for medical students.
Angoff NR
IRB; 1985; 7(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Perspectives of protocol reviewers.
Moline ML; Aisen MW
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 11653327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Do medical student research subjects need special protection?
Christakis N
IRB; 1985; 7(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics of drug experimentation.
Sgreccia E
Dolentium Hominum; 1987; 4(2nd Yr. 1):60-75. PubMed ID: 11653200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal and ethical concepts involved in informed consent to human research.
Woody KJ
Calif West Law Rev; 1981; 18(1):50-79. PubMed ID: 11658328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed guidelines for the participation of persons with dementia as research subjects.
Keyserlingk EW; Glass K; Kogan S; Gauthier S
Perspect Biol Med; 1995; 38(2):319-61. PubMed ID: 11644666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Americans want to water down Helsinki Declaration.
Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Mar; No. 136():3-4. PubMed ID: 11657531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics of Research Involving Children: Proceedings of a National Workshop.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1993; 4(1):12-41. PubMed ID: 11659941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.
Prentice ED; Antonson DL
IRB; 1987; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11649892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
Herch F; Flower R
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimentation and research.
Annas GJ
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11653330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A new problem for IRBs: screening for HIV antibodies.
Meyers K
IRB; 1989; 11(6):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Approving high risk, rejecting low risk: the case of two cases.
Shannon TA; Ockene IS; Levine RJ
IRB; 1985; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 11649618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
