These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661316)
21. Abortion: the last resort. Segers MC America (NY); 1975 Dec; 133(21):456-8. PubMed ID: 11664571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Position paper on health care and society. National Federation of Catholic Physicians' Guilds Linacre Q; 1995 Feb; 62(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 11654259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Legislating the control of behavior control: autonomy and the coercive use of organic therapies. Shapiro MH South Calif Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 47(2):237-356. PubMed ID: 11660869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Laetrile: statutory and constitutional limitations on the regulation of ineffective drugs. Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Nov; 127(1):233-72. PubMed ID: 11661627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Asexual reproduction and genetic engineering: a constitutional assessment of the technology of cloning. Pizzulli F South Calif Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 47(2):476-584. PubMed ID: 11660870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Seeking self-determination in the Patient Self-Determination Act. Sabatino CP; Gottlich V Clgh Rev; 1991 Oct; 25(6):639-47. PubMed ID: 11651277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Combining the best of two medical worlds: Canadian universality and United States' freedom. Benjamin WW Humane Med; 1992 Oct; 8(4):271-85. PubMed ID: 11651423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Laetrile: individual choice for cancer patients. Block RE Rev Law Soc Change; 1978; 7(2):313-34. PubMed ID: 11661706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Is there a right to fetal tissue transplantation? Morgan GL Univ Tasman Law Rev; 1991; 10(2):129-56. PubMed ID: 11659574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A lesson in judicial abdication: Roe v. Arizona Board of Regents and the right of privacy. Sirkis JE Ariz State Law J; 1976; 1976(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 11663820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Morgentaler decision: Parliament's options. Hovius B Can Fam Law Q; 1988; 3():137-65. PubMed ID: 11659378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Rights over one's own body: a woman-affirming health care policy. Holmes HB; Peterson SR Hum Rights Q; 1981; 3(2):71-87. PubMed ID: 11658592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously. Goldner JA St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Health information privacy. Gostin LO Cornell Law Rev; 1995 Mar; 80(3):451-528. PubMed ID: 11660159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Demanded medical care. Menikoff J Ariz State Law J; 1998; 30(4):1091-126. PubMed ID: 11660771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Legislation and the living will. McCormick RA; Hellegers AE America (NY); 1977 Mar; 136(10):210-3. PubMed ID: 11664720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The right-to-die societies of the world. Caucanas-Pisier P Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 11649216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A constitutional right to health care: an unlikely development. Carey SC Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(3):492-514. PubMed ID: 11661100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Health care choice and the Constitution: reconciling privacy and public health. Patterson EG Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 42(1):1-91. PubMed ID: 11659255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]