These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661438)
1. The Quinlan decision. Lyons C Christ Crisis; 1976 May; 36(8):103-4. PubMed ID: 11661438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. No-code orders vs. resuscitation: the decision to withhold life-prolonging treatment from the terminally ill. Allan SM Wayne Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 26(1):139-72. PubMed ID: 11661826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment. Bolsen B Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re L.H.R. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 11644498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court grants guardianship to father in Quinlan case. Ryser J Am Med News; 1976 Apr; 19(15):13+. PubMed ID: 11661315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Searching for proper judicial recognition of hospital ethics committees in decisions to forego medical treatment. Murphy CA Gold Gate Law Rev; 1990; 20(2):319-44. PubMed ID: 11651055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan. Hirsh HL; Donovan RE Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Decisionmaking for the incompetent terminally ill patient: a compromise in a solution eliminates a compromise of patients' rights. Knezevich CA Indiana Law J; 1982; 57(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 11649706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The problem of prolonged death: who should decide? Stewart SM Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 11660880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death, dying and the law: a prosecutorial view of the Quinlan case. Collester DG Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):304-28. PubMed ID: 11661463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology. Hyland WF; Baime DS Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Quinlan: a practical overview. Coburn DR Ark Law Rev; 1977; 31(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11662409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care. Gorski SL Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The case of Joseph Saikewicz. Annas GJ New Physician; 1979 Mar; 28(3):45-46+. PubMed ID: 11664987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The tragic case of Karen Ann Quinlan. Healey JM Conn Med; 1979 Jun; 43(6):399. PubMed ID: 11643501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. It's our right to pull the plug. Bates RC Med Econ; 1977 May; 54(10):162-6. PubMed ID: 11661474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mediating life and death decisions. Hoffmann DE Ariz Law Rev; 1994; 36(4):821-77. PubMed ID: 11656438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Termination of medical treatment. Horan DJ Forum; 1981; 16(3):470-87. PubMed ID: 11662910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]