These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation. Ratnoff MF Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled. Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychosurgery: the law's response. Annas GJ; Glantz LH Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):249-67. PubMed ID: 11661084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners. Herch F; Flower R Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimentation on humans in biomedical research: implications for the industry of recent legislation and cases. Standridge LW Women Lawyers J; 1977; 63(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 11663032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of institutional review boards on clinical research. Levine RJ Perspect Biol Med; 1980 Pt 2): S99-S114, Winter; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 11663073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects. Bryant LE John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis. Hogue LL Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations. Gray BH IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The politics of informed consent. Weston HB Natl Forum; 1978; 58(4):23-6. PubMed ID: 11661867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal experimentation and federal regulation. Horan DJ Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 11664796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy. Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications. Reback GL Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]