466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661462)
1. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan.
Hirsh HL; Donovan RE
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Death, dying and the law: a prosecutorial view of the Quinlan case.
Collester DG
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):304-28. PubMed ID: 11661463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment.
Bolsen B
Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
Stell LK
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Law at the edge of life: issues of death and dying.
Janzen PS
Hamline Law Rev; 1984 Jun; 7(2):431-62. PubMed ID: 11649814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there a right to die?
Grad FP
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1976; 12(4):489-529. PubMed ID: 11663026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Institutional ethics: hospital practices and policies for denying life-sustaining treatment.
Ross J; Wenger N
Whittier Law Rev; 1994; 15(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 11652884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment": a critique.
Williams JR
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1984 Nov; 17(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 11651758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Quinlan: one court's answer to the problem of death with dignity.
Falck DP
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1977; 34(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 11663016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death and dying in Tennessee.
McKenney EJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. No-code orders vs. resuscitation: the decision to withhold life-prolonging treatment from the terminally ill.
Allan SM
Wayne Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 26(1):139-72. PubMed ID: 11661826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Euthanasia: the physician's liability.
Thurman V
John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1976; 10(1):148-72. PubMed ID: 11661425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
Barry RL
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. It's our right to pull the plug.
Bates RC
Med Econ; 1977 May; 54(10):162-6. PubMed ID: 11661474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.
Miller DH
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
Tecklenburg N
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Institutional ethics committee's roles, responsibilities, and benefits for physicians.
Minnesota Medical Association. Committee on Ethics and Medical-Legal Affairs
Minn Med; 1985 Aug; 68(8):605, 607-612. PubMed ID: 11643801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
