466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661462)
21. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 31 Mar 1976.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1976; 355():647-72. PubMed ID: 11646053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The right to die.
Logan P
Month; 1976 Jun; 9(6):199-202. PubMed ID: 11661306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
Longino PH
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath.
Glantz LH; Swazey JP
Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The "living will": the right to death with dignity?
Strand JG
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1976; 26(2):485-526. PubMed ID: 11661320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The withdrawal of treatment: the costs and benefits of guidelines.
Shannon TA
Bioethics Dig; 1978 Apr; 3(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 11660917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The life support cases: myths and realities.
Hartz JN
Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):18-20, 33, 52+. PubMed ID: 11653530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Hospice: the legal ramification of a place to die.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1981; 56(4):673-702. PubMed ID: 11658767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The Quinlan decision.
Lyons C
Christ Crisis; 1976 May; 36(8):103-4. PubMed ID: 11661438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Decision making about medical innovation: the role of the advocate.
Rouse F
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):607-16. PubMed ID: 11652856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The tort liability of hospital ethics committees.
Merritt AL
South Calif Law Rev; 1987 Jul; 60(5):1239-97. PubMed ID: 11658947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Classification of critically ill patients: a legal examination.
Fama AJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1980 Oct; 24(3):514-33. PubMed ID: 11665253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Decisionmaking for the incompetent terminally ill patient: a compromise in a solution eliminates a compromise of patients' rights.
Knezevich CA
Indiana Law J; 1982; 57(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 11649706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. United States: the right to die--tangles between medicine and the law.
Lancet; 1984 Feb; 1(8373):387-8. PubMed ID: 11644278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Consumer sovereignty vs. informed consent: saying no to requests to "do everything" for dying patients.
Weber LJ
Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):95-102. PubMed ID: 11651037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. When a life is no life--the right to die.
Raskas BS
Shma; 1975 Dec; 6(103):18-9. PubMed ID: 11662176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In re Quinlan: a practical overview.
Coburn DR
Ark Law Rev; 1977; 31(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11662409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Care of the hopelessly ill.
Paris JJ; Varga AC
America (NY); 1984 Sep; 151(7):141-4. PubMed ID: 11658463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
