These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661465)
21. Death on the California ballot: giving healers the sanction to kill. Kass LR Am Enterp; 1992; 3(5):44-51. PubMed ID: 11651570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative. Tomlinson AK Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Living wills and the right to die with dignity. Lanham D; Fehlberg B Melb Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 18(2):329-49. PubMed ID: 11651582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Final arrangements: what you should know about living wills. Helm A Nursing; 1985 Nov; ():39-43. PubMed ID: 11649980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death. Kutner L Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Legal immorality not personal freedom. Bleich JD Shma; 1977 Apr; 7(132):101-2. PubMed ID: 11661464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Deciding on passive euthanasia. Jaretzki A Contemp Surg; 1977 Oct; 11(4):68-69+. PubMed ID: 11661703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Voluntary euthanasia: a proposed remedy. Cole SS; Shea MS Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):826-56. PubMed ID: 11661204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics. Vitiello M LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Jewish law permits natural death. Siegel S Shma; 1977 Apr; 7(132):96-7. PubMed ID: 11661467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions. Clementino BJ Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The limitations of legislation. Orentlicher D MD Law Rev; 1994; 53():1255-305. PubMed ID: 11657533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The evanescence of living wills. Francis LP Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Living will statutes: a proposal for Kentucky. Landers MC KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(2):395-418. PubMed ID: 11649956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The constitutionality of pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. Benton EC Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 43(6):1821-37. PubMed ID: 11656069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute. Lieberson A Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Death in the legislature: inventing legal tools for autonomy. Sabatino CP Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):309-39. PubMed ID: 11652237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes. Burch TJ MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The right to die: new options in California. Steel WE Christ Century; 1976 Nov; 93(37):996-7. PubMed ID: 11661348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. "Aid-in-dying": the right to die or the right to kill? -- A public forum. Humphry D; Risley R; Marker R; Stanton J Int Rev Nat Fam Plann; 1988; 12(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 11650177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]