These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661497)
1. Torts--wrongful death--a viable fetus is a "person" for purposes of the Rhode Island Wrongful Death Act. Reilly TP Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1977; 46(1):266-75. PubMed ID: 11661497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Wrongful death--a viable fetus is a person within the meaning of the Massachusetts Wrongful Death Statute. Blakeley T Tex Tech Law Rev; 1976; 7(3):821-7. PubMed ID: 11664789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Torts--wrongful death--recovery for wrongful death of a stillborn fetus examined. Cherken HS Villanova Law Rev; 1976 Oct; 21(5-6):994-1005. PubMed ID: 11664726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Torts--wrongful death--a viable fetus is a "person" under the New Mexico wrongful death statute: Salazar v. St. Vincent Hospital. Donahue SL N M Law Rev; 1982; 12(2):843-59. PubMed ID: 11658657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Damages for the wrongful death of a fetus--proof of fetal viability--Illinois recognizes an action for the wrongful death of a stillborn fetus. Elliott H Chic Kent Law Rev; 1974; 51(1):227-43. PubMed ID: 11662120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases. Klasing MS Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dunn v. Rose Way, Inc.: no recovery for wrongful death of a viable fetus under Section 611.20 of the Iowa Code. Hodgson SL Iowa Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 70(2):545-64. PubMed ID: 11649214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. California's response for wrongful death of a stillborn fetus: Justus v. Atchison. Dow PA Pepperdine Law Rev; 1978; 3(2):589-608. PubMed ID: 11664965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and pre-natal injury: a legal and philosophical analysis. Lenhardt WA West Ont Law Rev; 1974; 13():97-123. PubMed ID: 11664446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers. Dougherty CJ Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hopkins v. McBane. North Dakota. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1984 Dec; 359():862-5. PubMed ID: 12041129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preconceptional tort liability--Renslow v. Mennonite Hospital. Greene SB De Paul Law Rev; 1978; 27(3):891-910. PubMed ID: 11664968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right to maintain action or to recover damages for death of unborn child. Shapiro SR Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 84():411-72. PubMed ID: 12091934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Greater Southeast Community Hospital v. Williams. District of Columbia. Court of Appeals Atl Report; 1984 Oct; 482():394-9. PubMed ID: 11648506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arizona court says viable fetus is a person. N Y Times Web; 1985 Apr; ():D19. PubMed ID: 11646423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Injuries to unborn children. Cane PF Aust Law J; 1977 Oct; 51(10):704-20. PubMed ID: 11665004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]