These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661497)
21. Legal duty to the unborn plaintiff: is there a limit? Gulino F Fordham Urban Law J; 1978; 6(2):217-50. PubMed ID: 11664960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro fertilization: new territory for the preconception tort. Blow RM GMU Law Rev; 1982; 5(1):169-83. PubMed ID: 11658443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism. Westerfield L South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The law of tortious prenatal death since Roe v. Wade. Kader D Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(4):639-66. PubMed ID: 11658350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. People v. Davis: California's murder statute and the requirement of viability for fetal murder. Qureshi JN Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1995; 25(3):579-614. PubMed ID: 11656563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Werling v. Sandy. Ohio. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1985 Apr; 476():1053-7. PubMed ID: 12041268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Didonato v. Wortman. North Carolina. Supreme Court South East Report Second Ser; 1987 Jul; 358():489-97. PubMed ID: 12041309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Wrongful death and the unborn: an examination of recovery after Roe v. Wade. Kruger RE J Fam Law; 1973; 13(1):99-114. PubMed ID: 11660867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. When the death of a fetus is murder. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1994 May; ():B20. PubMed ID: 11647483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Legal criteria for distinguishing between live and dead human foetuses and newborn children. Bates P Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 11649731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Commonwealth v. Cass. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Barnstable North East Rep Second Ser; 1984 Aug; 467():1324-30. PubMed ID: 12041184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Judicial recognition of feticide: usurping the power of the legislature? Barrazotto ME J Fam Law; 1986; 24(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 11649213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Preconception injuries: viable extension of prenatal injury law or inconceivable tort? Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1977; 12(1):143-78. PubMed ID: 11665002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Toward rational boundaries of tort liability for injury to the unborn: prenatal injuries, preconception injuries and wrongful life. Robertson HB Duke Law J; 1978 Jan; 1978(5):1401-57. PubMed ID: 11665115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion, amniocentesis and the law. Dickens BM Am J Comp Law; 1986; 34(2):249-70. PubMed ID: 11655824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The unborn child in Canadian law. Weiler KM; Catton K Osgoode Hall Law J; 1976 Dec; 14(3):643-59. PubMed ID: 11664746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Torts prior to conception: a new theory of liability. Duven DR Neb Law Rev; 1977; 56(3):706-22. PubMed ID: 11664803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]