These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661546)
1. The right to a natural death. Csank JF Hum Life Rev; 1978; 4(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 11661546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Death and dying in Tennessee. McKenney EJ Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Death and life decisions: who is in control? Kenney SC Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides? Corbett KA; Raciti RM New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Rudolfo Torres Conservatee. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 11644499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re L.H.R. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 11644498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The tragic choice: termination of care for patients in a permanent vegetative state. N Y Univ Law Rev; 1976 May; 51(2):285-310. PubMed ID: 11663673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent. Brant J Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology. Hyland WF; Baime DS Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I. Hodgman DR; Frazer QR Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner. Bates KW Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards. Strasser M KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]