These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661548)

  • 1. Ms. Pilpel v. Mr. Hyde.
    Buckley WF
    Hum Life Rev; 1978; 4(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 11661548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment.
    Skahn SL
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unborn and the born again.
    New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amendment No. 336.
    Bartlett DF
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human life amendment.
    Helms J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Jan; 123(4):S436-45. PubMed ID: 11664767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics.
    Tatalovich R; Daynes BW
    Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Hyde decision denies equal health care access'.
    Branch De
    Ob Gyn News; 1980 Aug; 15(15):1+. PubMed ID: 11664010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Debate on the Hyde Amendment.
    Flood DJ
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1976 Aug; 122(123):H8631-42. PubMed ID: 11664791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae.
    Gold RB
    Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
    Butler PA
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court, abortion policy, and state response: a preliminary analysis.
    Nicholson JB; Steward DW
    Publius; 1978; 8(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11664024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall.
    Sewell CC; Wetterer MA
    KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A human life amendment.
    Helms J
    Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(2):7-42. PubMed ID: 11663729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hyde and go seek: a response to Representative Hyde.
    Pilpel HF
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1101-23. PubMed ID: 11651774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions.
    Gunty S
    Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
    Wilcox JK
    Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Poor women get word on health from Court.
    Mann J
    Washington Post; 1980 Jul; ():B1, B3. PubMed ID: 11647332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. State constitutions: the new battlefield for abortion rights.
    Steinschneider J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():284-94. PubMed ID: 11649953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
    Hendrickson E
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.