These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661627)
21. United States v. Rutherford. 18 Jun 1979. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1979; 442():544-59. PubMed ID: 12038357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Government regulation of health-care drugs of questionable efficacy. Milis RJ San Diego Law Rev; 1977 Mar; 14(2):378-413. PubMed ID: 11663726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Private rights to adulterated/misbranded articles. McMonagle L AIDS Public Policy J; 1987; 2(2):33-49. PubMed ID: 11650029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Laetrile wins one in federal court. Med World News; 1978 Aug; 19(16):25. PubMed ID: 11645367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Laetrile controversy: background and issues. Eddy CH Ariz Law Rev; 1978; 20(3):825-60. PubMed ID: 11662772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Utility, autonomy and drug regulation. Scriven T Int J Appl Philos; 1984; 2(2):27-42. PubMed ID: 11653067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. People v. Privitera. Olson RE Human Rights; 1977; 6(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 11661736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Picking your poison: the drug efficacy requirement and the right of privacy. Rushing DG UCLA Law Rev; 1978 Feb; 25(3):577-617. PubMed ID: 11663959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Regulation of drug treatments for HIV and AIDS: a contractarian model of access. Salbu SR Yale J Regul; 1994; 11(2):401-53. PubMed ID: 11660141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Laetrile--consumer protection is the bottom line. Martin DS Med World News; 1977 Jun; 18(13):56. PubMed ID: 11661484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Paternalism and the regulation of drugs. Sagoff M Int J Appl Philos; 1984; 2(2):43-57. PubMed ID: 11653068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine. Brownstein A Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Just what the doctor ordered: the role of unconventional therapy in the treatment of cancer in minors. Grumet BR Fam Law Q; 1980; 14(2):63-98. PubMed ID: 11665187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Laetrile's message to the FDA. Spivak J Wall St J (East Ed); 1977 Jul; ():12. PubMed ID: 11649063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Faith (healing), hope and charity at the FDA: the politics of AIDS drug trials. Annas GJ Villanova Law Rev; 1989 Sep; 34(5):771-97. PubMed ID: 11651162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Assisted suicide and reproductive freedom: exploring some connections. Appleton SF Wash Univ Law Q; 1998; 76(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 11657576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Health information privacy. Gostin LO Cornell Law Rev; 1995 Mar; 80(3):451-528. PubMed ID: 11660159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The right to die. Sunstein CR Yale Law J; 1997 Jan; 106(4):1123-63. PubMed ID: 11656791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Governmental regulation of heart transplantation and the right to privacy. Merriken K; Overcast TD J Contemp Law; 1985; 11(2):481-514. PubMed ID: 11656659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Are absolute bans on assisted suicide constitutional? I say no. Sedler RA Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):725-33. PubMed ID: 11654368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]