These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661758)
1. The IRB's monitoring function: four concepts of monitoring. Heath EJ IRB; 1979; 1(5):103+. PubMed ID: 11661758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How many protocols are deferred? One IRB's experience. Chlebowski RT IRB; 1984; 6(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 11650665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Changing federal regulation of IRB's: the Commission's recommendations and the FDA's proposals. Levine RJ IRB; 1979 Mar; 1(1):1-3+. PubMed ID: 11662736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use? Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Ethics of Human Experimentation: Reinventing the Research Ethics Board: Proceedings of a National Workshop held in Ottawa, Ontario, March 5-6, 1995. National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada) NCBHR Commun; 1996; 7(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 11654527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An IRB's consent form survey. Lewis JH IRB; 1984; 6(4):10. PubMed ID: 11649561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychosurgery in Massachusetts: a task force report. Stone AA Mass Journal Ment Health; 1975; 5(3):26-54. PubMed ID: 11664587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How can an IRB avoid the use of obsolete consent forms? Adkinson NF; Starklauf BL; Blake DA IRB; 1983; 5(1):10. PubMed ID: 11649510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The report of the Advisory Research Committee on the ethics review of research involving human subjects. Queens Gazette; 1974 : 1-5, 30 Jan; 6(4) Suppl):. PubMed ID: 11663457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics review in Canada: highlights from a national workshop, part 1. Miller JN Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1989 Nov; 22(7):515-23. PubMed ID: 11654894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S. Gray BH Sci Technol Human Values; 1978; (25):. PubMed ID: 11663042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical experimentation and the protection of human rights. World Federation of Associations of Clinical Toxicology Centers and Poison Control Centers Bull Med Leg Toxicol; 1979; 22(5):623-32. PubMed ID: 11661830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The chaplain's role on a hospital's committee on human experimentation. Kerney LG Bull Am Protestant Hosp Assoc; 1974; 38(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 11661209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics in medical research. P N G Med J; 1973 Sep; 16(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 11661003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When does an experimental/innovative procedure become an accepted procedure? Norton ML Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1975 Oct; 38(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 11661188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reviewing research involving children: the practice of British research ethics committees. Hall D IRB; 1988; 10(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Structuring the review of human genetics protocols, part III: gene therapy studies. Glass KC; Weijer C; Cournoyer D; Lemmens T; Palmour RM; Shapiro SH; Freedman B IRB; 1999; 21(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 11657874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]