These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661811)

  • 1. A dilemma for the legal and medical professions: euthanasia and the defective newborn.
    Mueller RA; Phoenix GK
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1978; 22(3):501-18. PubMed ID: 11661811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn.
    Portela C
    Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Euthanasia, medical treatment and the mongoloid child: death as a treatment of choice?
    Horan DJ
    Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 11660889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Iafelice by Iafelice v. Zarafu.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):239-40. PubMed ID: 11644328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Passive euthanasia of defective newborn infants: legal considerations.
    Robertson JA; Fost N
    J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):883-9. PubMed ID: 11662998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defective newborns: inconsistent application of legal principles emphasized by the Infant Doe case.
    Baumgardner KL
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1983; 14(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11651729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The order to treat: judicial intervention in benign neglect of defective infants.
    Horan DJ; Guerrini ME
    Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 11650519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preserving the life of children.
    Louisiana
    Revis Statut La; 1982; Title 40 Sections 1299.36.1 to 1299.36.3():. PubMed ID: 12041499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The law and death--an overview.
    Stephan LD; Billings MN
    J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 11662357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Criminal counts dropped in Siamese twins case.
    Wadler J
    Washington Post; 1981 Jul; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: a national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons.
    Shaw A; Randolph JG; Manard B
    Pediatrics; 1977 Oct; 60(4-Part 2):588-99. PubMed ID: 11664868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: our moral obligation.
    Otten M
    Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 11657340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: the right to choose.
    Smith S
    Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 11657338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill child.
    Waldman AM
    J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):890-2. PubMed ID: 11662999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Little murders.
    Patrick JG
    New Times; 1978 Apr; 10(7):32-7. PubMed ID: 11658277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Siamese twins, focus of ethical debate, are separated.
    Ob Gyn News; 1982 Oct 15-31; 17(20):7. PubMed ID: 11655561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The case of the Bloomington baby.
    Bannon A
    Hum Life Rev; 1982; 8(4):63-8. PubMed ID: 11651707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ambivalent on court role.
    Hellegers AE
    Ob Gyn News; 1974 Apr; 9(8):38-9. PubMed ID: 11651756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whatever happened to the Danville Siamese twins?
    Steinbock B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Aug; 17(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The physician's dilemma: a doctor's view--what the law should be.
    Teel K
    Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11660887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.