These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661823)
1. State interference with personhood: the privacy right, necessity defense, and proscribed medical therapies. Stratton RT Pac Law J; 1979 Jul; 10(2):773-800. PubMed ID: 11661823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The uncertain application of the right of privacy in personal medical decisions: the Laetrile cases. Christensen J Ohio State Law J; 1981; 42(2):523-50. PubMed ID: 11649547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Government regulation of health-care drugs of questionable efficacy. Milis RJ San Diego Law Rev; 1977 Mar; 14(2):378-413. PubMed ID: 11663726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy of medical records. Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Committee on Federal Legislation Rec Assoc Bar City New York; 1980 Nov; 35(8):488-514. PubMed ID: 11649553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to choose an unproven method of treatment. Unan VA Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1979 Dec; 13(1):227-45. PubMed ID: 11662827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A drug addict's right to anonymity. DeSabato AA Villanova Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 20(4):800-36. PubMed ID: 11664514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laetrile: the battle moves into the courtroom. Schwartz RL Am Bar Assoc J; 1979 Feb; 65():224-8. PubMed ID: 11661617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Laetrile controversy: background and issues. Eddy CH Ariz Law Rev; 1978; 20(3):825-60. PubMed ID: 11662772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Privacy rights in medical records. Cleaver CM Fordham Urban Law J; 1984-1985; 13(1):165-204. PubMed ID: 11650743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Laetrile and the privacy right in decisional responsibility. Volzer HJ Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(4):395-429. PubMed ID: 11662802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A constitutional right to health care: an unlikely development. Carey SC Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(3):492-514. PubMed ID: 11661100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right of privacy in choosing medical treatment: should terminally ill persons have access to drugs not yet approved by the Food and Drug Administration? Power SH John Marshall Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):693-714. PubMed ID: 11650094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Laetrile: individual choice for cancer patients. Block RE Rev Law Soc Change; 1978; 7(2):313-34. PubMed ID: 11661706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians. Bobinski MA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Private rights to adulterated/misbranded articles. McMonagle L AIDS Public Policy J; 1987; 2(2):33-49. PubMed ID: 11650029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection. Wilcox JK Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized medical records and the right to privacy: the emerging federal response. Boyer BB Buffalo Law Rev; 1975; 25(1):37-118. PubMed ID: 11664544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code. Picher PC Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate. Langley DB Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]