These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661834)
1. New York appellate court upholds right of comatose patient to refuse life-prolonging treatment. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1980; 4(3):156-9. PubMed ID: 11661834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right of the dying to refuse life prolonging medical procedures: the evolving importance of state constitutions. Marks TC; Morgan RC Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1992; 18(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 11654441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment. Matthews MA Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Right to die upheld for comatose patients. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 11652365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right of privacy and the terminally-ill patient: establishing the "right-to-die". McGinley T Mercer Law Rev; 1980; 31(2):603-15. PubMed ID: 11661875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Storar: euthanasia for incompetent patients, a proposed model. Haber JG Pace Law Rev; 1983; 3(2):351-74. PubMed ID: 11658505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy. Lyon EA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity. Mulholland KA Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Government as arbiter, not custodian: relational privacy as foundation for a right to refuse medical treatment prolonging incompetents' lives. Cox SE N M Law Rev; 1988; 18(1):131-52. PubMed ID: 11652538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation. Adams CR; Adams CT Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner. Bates KW Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients. Gottlich V Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prolonging life and withdrawing treatment: legal issues. Horan DJ; Grant ER Linacre Q; 1983 May; 50(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 11653531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members. Healey JM Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Eichner/Storar decision: a year's perspective. Dunn LJ Law Med Health Care; 1982 Jun; 10(3):117-119, 141. PubMed ID: 11643893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Watson DE Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]