These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661835)
1. Mass. highest court upholds right to die for incompetent patient. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1980; 4(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 11661835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Delaware Supreme Court upholds right of incompetent person to die. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1981; 5(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 11663212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutional law--right to refuse medical treatment--decisions to terminate life-prolonging treatment for incompetent patients--In re Spring, No. 2030 (Mass. order of Jan. 14, 1980). Lubinsky MS West New Engl Law Rev; 1980; 2(4):759-74. PubMed ID: 11649558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent. Brant J Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members. Healey JM Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In the Matter of Elizabeth Visbeck: an alleged incompetent. Nimz MM Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11644463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar. Williams SE Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In the matter of Mary Hier. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rasmussen v. Fleming. Pollard CT Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz. Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client. Harner SR Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Two steps forward, one step back": an analysis of New Jersey's latest "right-to-die" decisions. Moore NJ Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):955-98. PubMed ID: 11650182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma. Peterson GW Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards. Strasser M KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital. Nimz MM Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]