166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661875)
1. The right of privacy and the terminally-ill patient: establishing the "right-to-die".
McGinley T
Mercer Law Rev; 1980; 31(2):603-15. PubMed ID: 11661875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die.
Ellman IM
Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment.
Davis PK
Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Zaremba JF
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there a constitutional right to die?
Wickett A
Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
Mulholland KA
Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment.
Matthews MA
Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
Adams CR; Adams CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
Dooling RP
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
Solnick PB
Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Quinlan: defining the basis for terminating life support under the right of privacy.
Smith WF
Tulsa Law J; 1976; 12(1):150-67. PubMed ID: 11661422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The issue of personal choice: the competent incurable patient and the right to commit suicide?
Morgan RC; Marks TC; Harty-Golder B
Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 11651516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Jane Doe.
Cameron JC
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 11644330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Substituted judgment and the terminally-ill incompetent.
Santurri EN; Werpehowski W
Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):484-501. PubMed ID: 11649637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to die a natural death: a discussion of In re Quinlan and the California Natural Death Act.
Randall MW
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1977; 46(1):192-206. PubMed ID: 11661496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The preservation of life and self-determination.
McCormick RA; Veatch RM
Theol Stud; 1980 Jun; 41(2):390-6. PubMed ID: 11661994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
