These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661875)

  • 21. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
    Clementino BJ
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
    Eisenberg KG
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Privacy and personhood revisited: a new framework for substitute decisionmaking for the incompetent, incurably ill adult.
    Fentiman LC
    George Washington Law Rev; 1989 Mar; 57(4):801-48. PubMed ID: 11651992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
    Watson DE
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The right to die: progress and peril.
    Capron AM
    Euthan Rev; 1987; 2(1 2):41-59. PubMed ID: 11649218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Constitutional law--Florida's right to die--a question of litigation or legislation?
    O'Shea R
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1980; 8(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 11661918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The assault on privacy in healthcare decisionmaking.
    Rich BA
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1991; 68(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 11651237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
    Vitiello M
    LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
    Dunphy SM; Cross JH
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Therefore, choose death.
    Brown ML
    Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medico-legal aspects of the 'right to die' legislation in Australia.
    Mendelson D
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 19(1):112-52. PubMed ID: 11654112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New York appellate court upholds right of comatose patient to refuse life-prolonging treatment.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1980; 4(3):156-9. PubMed ID: 11661834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does pro-choice mean pro-Kevorkian? An essay on Roe, Casey, and the right to die.
    Kreimer SF
    Am Univ Law Rev; 1995 Feb; 44(3):803-54. PubMed ID: 11660036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
    Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is there a right to die?
    Grad FP
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1976; 12(4):489-529. PubMed ID: 11663026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
    Riga PJ
    Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
    Brant J
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
    Cantor NL
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
    Burch TJ
    MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rejection of extraordinary medical care by a terminal patient: a proposed living will statute.
    Freeman J
    Iowa Law Rev; 1979 Mar; 64(3):573-658. PubMed ID: 11665074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.