These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661879)

  • 1. Tarasoff duty to warn discussed in three cases: no such duty found in Maryland.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1980; 4(5):313-315. PubMed ID: 11661879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
    Fed Suppl; 1980 Jul; 497():185-97. PubMed ID: 11648449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapist's obligation of confidentiality versus the duty to warn.
    Nesbitt NA
    Tulsa Law J; 1977; 12(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 11661722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Untangling Tarasoff: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California.
    Seligman BS
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Sep; 29(1):179-210. PubMed ID: 11661581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tarasoff, the doctrine of special relationships, and the psychotherapist's duty to warn.
    Schopp RF; Quattrocchi MR
    J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):13-37. PubMed ID: 11649643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychotherapist responsibility in notifying individuals at risk for exposure to HIV.
    Girardi JA; Keese RM; Traver LB; Cooksey DR
    J Sex Res; 1988 Feb; 25(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11659081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidentiality--the psychotherapist's nemesis.
    Greenlaw J
    Nurs Law Ethics; 1980 Nov; 1(9):5+. PubMed ID: 12083143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California--risk allocation in mental health care: whether to treat the patient or his victim.
    Lowe RH
    Utah Law Rev; 1975; 1975(2):553-69. PubMed ID: 11658320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judicial expansion of the Tarasoff doctrine: doctors' dilemma.
    Crocker EM
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):83-99. PubMed ID: 11658739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying Tarasoff to AIDS-related psychotherapy issues.
    Lamb DH; Clark C; Drumheller P; Frizzell K; Surrey L
    Prof Psychol Res Pr; 1989 Feb; 20(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11651018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A therapist's duty to potential victims: a nonthreatening view of Tarasoff.
    Leonard JB
    Law Hum Behav; 1977; 1(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 11661575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The legal perils of psychotherapeutic practice (part II): coping with Hedlund and Jablonski.
    Meyers CJ
    J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 11649644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tarasoff: five years later.
    Knapp S; Vandecreek L
    Prof Psychol; 1982 Aug; 13(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 11658658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 23 Dec 1974.
    California. Supreme Court
    Wests Calif Report; 1974; 118():129-45. PubMed ID: 11645905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness.
    Greenberg LT
    J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):315-48. PubMed ID: 11658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shaw v. Glickman. 13 Jun 1980.
    Maryland. Court of Special Appeals
    Atl Report; 1980; 415():625-31. PubMed ID: 11645940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tarasoff down under: the psychiatrist's duty to warn in Australia.
    Mendelson D; Mendelson G
    J Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1-2):33-61. PubMed ID: 11659859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: the duty to warn--common law and statutory problems for California psychotherapists.
    Cohen RN
    Calif West Law Rev; 1978; 14(1):153-82. PubMed ID: 11664959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 1 Jul 1976.
    California. Supreme Court, In Bank
    Wests Calif Report; 1976; 131():14-42. PubMed ID: 11646056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the duty to protect HIV-positive patients.
    Knapp S; VandeCreek L
    Prof Psychol Res Pr; 1990 Jun; 21(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 11653900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.