232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661885)
1. HHS publishes final debarment regulations.
Levine C
IRB; 1980 Nov; 2(9):10. PubMed ID: 11661885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
US Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Researcher denied future U.S. funds.
Broad WJ
Science; 1982 Jun; 216(4550):1081. PubMed ID: 11643749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Protecting human research subjects and the public: the role of FDA disqualification of clinical investigators.
Nightingale SL
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1980 Sep; 35(9):484-92. PubMed ID: 11661914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conference report on S. 540, a bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to establish a National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, and for other purposes.
Dingell JD
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1984 Oct; 130(131):H11339-60. PubMed ID: 11658583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fraud and sloppiness in science.
Schmaus W
Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Whistleblowing in biomedical research: report from a workshop.
Mishkin B
IRB; 1982 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 11658314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Congressmen investigate scientific fraud.
Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HHS readies regulations to cut hospitals' obligations to the poor.
Med World News; 1982 Sep; 23(18):24. PubMed ID: 11645478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
