These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661912)
1. The right to procreate: the dilemma of overpopulation and the United States judiciary. Bolner J; Jacobsen R Loyola Law Rev; 1979; 25(2):235-62. PubMed ID: 11661912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Population policy making: reproductive freedom and the "compelling" state interest. Yates KA UMKC Law Rev; 1973; 42(2):201-17. PubMed ID: 11661099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled. Dworkin R Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The privacy implications of Professor Anderson's proposed mandatory registry for bone marrow donation: a reply. Hartman RG Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):531-51. PubMed ID: 11656304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker. Burns SE Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fertility and coercion. Sen A Univ Chic Law Rev; 1996; 63(3):1035-61. PubMed ID: 11656979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Population control and abortion. Freeman HA Santa Clara Lawyer; 1973; 13(4):698-719. PubMed ID: 11663595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The United States' immigration laws: prospects for relief for foreign nationals seeking refuge from coercive sterilization or abortion practices in their homelands. Tang J St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1996; 15(2):371-401. PubMed ID: 11656877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The implantation of rights: an argument for unconditionally funded Norplant removal. Arnow RS Berkeley Womens Law J; 1996; 11():19-48. PubMed ID: 11657484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New reproductive technologies in Canada and the United States: same problems, different discourses. Young AH Temple Int Comp Law J; 1998; 12(1):43-85. PubMed ID: 11660812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Family planning through human cloning: is there a fundamental right? Wu L Columbia Law Rev; 1998 Oct; 98(6):1461-515. PubMed ID: 11658070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Norplant use in conjunction with the welfare system. Funk AM South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1993; 2(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 11652714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gender and culture in the globalization of bioethics. Gudorf CE St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1996; 15(2):331-51. PubMed ID: 11656875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The biological alteration cases. Gelman S William Mary Law Rev; 1995 May; 36(4):1203-301. PubMed ID: 11660332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The problem of coerced abortion in China and related ethical issues: commentary. Winkler MG Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1999; 8(4):477-9. PubMed ID: 11645186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion, ethics, and the common good: Who are we? What do we want? How do we get there? Araujo RJ Marquette Law Rev; 1993; 76():701-54. PubMed ID: 11659963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy. Martin PA; Lagod ML High Technol Law J; 1990; 5(2):257-310. PubMed ID: 11659412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of courts in the debate on assisted suicide: a communitarian approach. Beschle DL Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):367-405. PubMed ID: 11653000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]