366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11661927)
1. Sexual relations between psychotherapists and their patients: toward research or restraint.
Riskin LL
Calif Law Rev; 1979 Jul; 67(4):1000-27. PubMed ID: 11661927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
Ratnoff MF
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should we research doctor-patient sex?
Culver CM
IRB; 1981 May; 3(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11649368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting human subjects of research: an analysis of proposed amendments to HEW policy.
de Sola Pool I
PS (Wash DC); 1979; 12(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 11649394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. IRB review of psychotherapist-patient sexual relations.
Riskin LL
IRB; 1981 Dec; 3(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 11649415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical considerations in human experimentation.
Bernstein JE
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1975; 15(8-9):579-90. PubMed ID: 11661224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations.
Gray BH
IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Americans want to water down Helsinki Declaration.
Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Mar; No. 136():3-4. PubMed ID: 11657531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical and legal issues in group counseling.
Corey G; Williams GT; Moline ME
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(2):161-83. PubMed ID: 11654199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statement of ethical guidelines.
Society for the Scientific Study of Sex
J Sex Res; 1993 May; 30(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 11660660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.
Prentice ED; Antonson DL
IRB; 1987; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11649892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
Hogue LL
Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual intimacies with clients after termination: should a prohibition be explicit?
Vasquez MJ
Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 11649351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychosurgery: the law's response.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):249-67. PubMed ID: 11661084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The subject is children.
Hiatt F
Trial; 1975; 11(6):19+. PubMed ID: 11662203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Conference report: ethical guidelines for research and clinical perspectives on human sexuality.
Kolodny RC
Newsl Sci Technol Human Values; 1978 Jun; (24):. PubMed ID: 11660918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual misconduct of therapists.
Simon RI
Trial; 1985 May; 21(5):46-51. PubMed ID: 11650738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Teaching research ethics through role-play and discussion.
Rosnow RL
Teach Psychol; 1990 Oct; 17(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 11651045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
