These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662002)
1. Judicial limitations on parental autonomy in the medical treatment of minors. Davis ET Neb Law Rev; 1980; 59(4):1093-126. PubMed ID: 11662002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical treatment for minor children: the roles of parents, the state, the child, and the Supreme Court of the United States. Crutchfield CF Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 11651710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Limiting Gillick. Douglas G Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():34-5. PubMed ID: 11651271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of children in making health care decisions: a comparative approach. Broyde CS Natl Jew Law Rev; 1987; 2():123-35. PubMed ID: 11658826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical decision making for and by children: tensions between parent, state, and child. Wadlington W Univ Ill Law Rev; 1994; 2():311-36. PubMed ID: 11659988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In the matter of David Willmann, a minor. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 11644061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment. Davis PK Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family. Baron CH Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pentland v. Pentland. Canada. Ontario. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1978 Apr; 86():585-91. PubMed ID: 12041086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical decision making for children: an analysis of competing interests. Ewald LS St Louis Univ Law J; 1982 Oct; 25(4):689-733. PubMed ID: 11658427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment and minors: issues not involving lifesaving treatment. King PA J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):241-65. PubMed ID: 11658744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Custody of a Minor. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Apr; 434():601-11. PubMed ID: 12041208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The conflict between child's medical needs and parents' religious beliefs. Probst JE Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(2):175-92. PubMed ID: 11652023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Laetrile: may the state intervene on behalf of a minor? Ainsworth MV; Wall T Univ Kans Law Rev; 1982; 30(3):409-28. PubMed ID: 12083079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors. Schmidt CG N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mourning the loss of a son. Becker WM; Becker P Newsweek; 1983 May; ():17. PubMed ID: 11658408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Who are you to say what my best interest is?" Minors' due process rights when admitted by parents for inpatient mental health treatment. Schmidt K Wash Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 71(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 11660505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Parens patriae: a revised judicial approach in medical-religious conflicts in Michigan. Fleming JA Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1981; 1981(1):83-126. PubMed ID: 11649705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When parents refuse consent to medical care for their children: the role of the nurse. Garey CC; Child Leg Rights J; 1996; 16(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11655110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]