These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662078)

  • 1. Physician-patient privilege: two rulings for, one against.
    Springer EW
    Hosp Top; 1973 Sep; 51(9):37-8. PubMed ID: 11662078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Private medical records: are they public property? A survey of privacy, confidentiality and privilege.
    Kmentt KA
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):274-307. PubMed ID: 11653828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The physician-patient privilege--an impediment to public health.
    Goldberg BA
    Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):787-804. PubMed ID: 11652431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidential communications: the doctor-patient privilege.
    Harnon E
    Isr Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 9(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 11664347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychotherapy and confidentiality.
    Slovenko R
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):375-96. PubMed ID: 11661273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychotherapist-patient testimonial privilege: a picture of misguided hope.
    Slovenko R
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):649-73. PubMed ID: 11664361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constitutional law--right of privacy--evidence law of privileges--the patient-litigant exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Christensen EL
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1977 Jun; 10(3):695-708. PubMed ID: 11664857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Keep the faith!...a lawyer's response.
    Berlin GA
    Med Counterpoint; 1973 Aug; 5(8):15+. PubMed ID: 11661043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical data privacy: automated interference with contractual relations.
    Fargo JJ
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1976; 25(2):491-517. PubMed ID: 11661294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The privacy of the individual.
    Doyle V
    Med J Aust; 1974 Aug; 2(2):suppl:21-3. PubMed ID: 4423466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical records and privileged communications: Hippocrates to Elvis Presley.
    Murphy MC
    Forum; 1980; 15(5):1040-9. PubMed ID: 11661980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Torts--doctor-patient relationship--physician's breach of confidentiality gives rise to patient's action for damages.
    Cohn JC
    Cumberland Samford Law Rev; 1974; 5(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 11661117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding patient confidentiality and health information tracking -- an overview.
    Domen R
    Bioethics Forum; 1998; 14(3-4):13-7. PubMed ID: 11660721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical confidence--civil liability for breach.
    Boyle C
    North Irel Leg Q; 1973; 24(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 11664255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legislative recognition of a physician-patient privilege.
    Sharpe GS
    Chittys Law J; 1975 Feb; 23(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11664676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computers and confidentiality in medicine.
    Br Med J; 1973 Nov; 4(5887):290-3. PubMed ID: 11663142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testimonial privilege and the problem of death: the Vincent Foster case and beyond.
    Behnke SH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(4):639-48. PubMed ID: 9894220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical privilege in Oregon.
    Byrnes TR
    Oregon Law Rev; 1976; 55(3):459-73. PubMed ID: 11662301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA
    Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protecting the privacy of the absent patient: Rudnick v. Superior Court.
    Tarr RW
    Hastings Law J; 1975 Sep; 27(1):99-135. PubMed ID: 11664510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.