380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662080)
1. Human guinea pigs: Congress considering limits.
Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1973 Mar; 31(10):519-22. PubMed ID: 11662080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
Ratnoff MF
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The protection of human subjects: an open letter to NIH.
Reynolds PD
Am Sociol; 1974 Nov; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 11663254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimentation on humans in biomedical research: implications for the industry of recent legislation and cases.
Standridge LW
Women Lawyers J; 1977; 63(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 11663032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The issues as viewed by the legislature.
Horowitz LC
Clin Res; 1973 Oct; 21(4):782-4. PubMed ID: 11660971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical science, the clinical trial and society.
Marston RQ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1973 Apr; 3(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11660997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human experimentation.
Behrens LB
Fed Proc; 1973 Feb; 32(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 11643535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974.
U.S
US Statut Large; 1974; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. National Research Service Awards and Protection of Human Subjects Act.
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Sep; 119(131):S16333-52. PubMed ID: 11663135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nondevelopmental research on human subjects: the impact of the recommendations of the National Commission.
Levine RJ
Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2359-64. PubMed ID: 892005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical considerations in human experimentation.
Bernstein JE
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1975; 15(8-9):579-90. PubMed ID: 11661224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can children be enrolled in a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of synthetic growth hormone?
Prentice ED; Antonson DL; Jameton A; Graber B; Sears T
IRB; 1989; 11(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11659085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constraints on experimentation: protecting children to death.
Holder AR
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1988; 6(1):137-56. PubMed ID: 11650241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
Wilson JP
Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a theory of control of medical experimentation with human subjects: the role of compensation.
Adams BR; Shea-Stonum M
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):604-48. PubMed ID: 11661167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
