BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662103)

  • 1. Experimenting on human subjects.
    May WE
    Linacre Q; 1974 Nov; 41(4):238-52. PubMed ID: 11662103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moral issues in medical experimentation on humans.
    Cohen C
    Philos Exch; 1979; 2(5):37-51. PubMed ID: 11658450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ethics of phase I pediatric oncology trials.
    Ackerman TF
    IRB; 1995; 17(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11653060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines for addressing ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research: a position paper.
    High DM; Whitehouse PJ; Post SG; Berg L
    Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1994; 8(Suppl. 4):66-74. PubMed ID: 11657676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proxy consent to human experimentation.
    May WE
    Linacre Q; 1976 May; 43(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 11662258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical considerations in human experimentation.
    Curran CE
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1975; 13(4):819-40. PubMed ID: 11661267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protectionism and the new research imperative in pediatric AIDS.
    Ackerman TF
    IRB; 1990; 12(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11654001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information for consent in human experimentation.
    Dickens BM
    Univ Tor Law J; 1974; 24(4):381-410. PubMed ID: 11664387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paul Ramsey, principled Protestant casuist: a retrospective.
    Carson RA
    Med Humanit Rev; 1988 Jan; 2(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 11645861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimentation on humans and gifts of tissue: Articles 20-23 of the Civil Code.
    Owker WF
    McGill Law J; 1973; 19(2):161-94. PubMed ID: 11664267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research in neonatology: improved ratio of risk to benefit through a scientifically based alteration in research design.
    Blackburn MG; Pleasure JR; Sorenson JH
    Clin Res; 1976 Dec; 24(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 11661368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consent-giving by guardians.
    Hellegers AE
    Ob Gyn News; 1976 Jul; 11(13):11. PubMed ID: 11664660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Did children change, or the guidelines?
    Alderson P
    Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Aug; No. 150():38-44. PubMed ID: 11657797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reflections on the report and recommendations of the National Commission: research on the fetus.
    Lebacqz K
    Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 11664797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Volunteering children for medical experiments.
    DiIanni A
    Linacre Q; 1989 Feb; 56(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 11650209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The enforcement of morals: nontherapeutic research on children.
    Ramsey P
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Aug; 6(4):21-30. PubMed ID: 133992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimenting on human subjects: philosophical perspectives.
    Macklin R; Sherwin S
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):434-71. PubMed ID: 11661163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Setting the limits.
    Pappworth MH
    World Health; 1976 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11686182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commentary on "Family dynamics and children in medical research.
    Robinson W
    J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(4):362-4. PubMed ID: 11644884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimentation on minors: whatever happened to Prince v. Massachusetts?
    Mitchell AM
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1975; 13(4):919-36. PubMed ID: 11661272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.